Graphql vs Mrugankpednekar Bill Splitter Mcp

In-depth architectural comparison of the Graphql and Mrugankpednekar Bill Splitter Mcp MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

G

Choose Graphql when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Graphql Details

Choose Mrugankpednekar Bill Splitter Mcp when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Mrugankpednekar Bill Splitter Mcp Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	G Graphql Developer Tools	Mrugankpednekar Bill Splitter Mcp Developer Tools
Summary	Turn any GraphQL API into MCP tools. Zero config, zero code.	Track and split shared expenses across trips, events, and groups. Create groups, add expenses, and…
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "graphql": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "graphql-to-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mrugankpednekar-bill-splitter-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mrugankpednekar-bill-splitter-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons