Graphql vs Mcpify

In-depth architectural comparison of the Graphql and Mcpify MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Graphql when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Graphql Details

Choose Mcpify when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Mcpify Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Graphql Developer Tools	Mcpify Developer Tools
Summary	Turn any GraphQL API into MCP tools. Zero config, zero code.	Turn any OpenAPI REST API into an MCP server so AI agents can call it — zero dependencies
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "graphql": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "graphql-to-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcpify": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "pulls"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons