Graphql vs Icemoon — control a real iPhone with AI

In-depth architectural comparison of the Graphql and Icemoon — control a real iPhone with AI MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

G

Choose Graphql when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Graphql Details

Choose Icemoon — control a real iPhone with AI when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Icemoon — control a real iPhone with AI Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	G Graphql Developer Tools	Icemoon — control a real iPhone with AI Developer Tools
Summary	Turn any GraphQL API into MCP tools. Zero config, zero code.	Control real, physical iPhones with AI: screen reading, human-like touch, no jailbreak.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "graphql": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "graphql-to-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "icemoon-control-a-real-iphone-with-ai": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "icemoon-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons