A side-by-side look at the Graphkeeper and Github MCP Server MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.
Verdict: choose Graphkeeper for version control work as a local process; choose Github MCP Server for version control over a hosted endpoint. You can also run both side by side in one mcpServers block.
Which MCP server should you choose?
Choose Graphkeeper when
You need dedicated capabilities in the Version Control domain.
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Github MCP Server tools 2
get_file_contents
getFileContents
Ready-to-paste client configs
Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.
Graphkeeper is categorized under Version Control and uses a local stdio subprocess. Github MCP Server belongs to Version Control and uses a remote HTTP/SSE transport. Pick Graphkeeper for version control work and Github MCP Server for version control.
Copy the mcpServers block from the config section on this page into your client's config (for example claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json), then fully restart the client.
Graphkeeper has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. Github MCP Server is listed as free. Auth: oauth 2.0. If a server needs environment variables such as API keys, define them under the env key in your client's MCP config.
Yes. MCP clients support multiple servers: add graphkeeper and github-github-mcp-server as separate keys in the same mcpServers object, and your assistant will call tools from either one.
On AllMCPs, Graphkeeper has a quality signal of 43/100 (Fair) with 2 views, 0 installs and 0 GitHub stars. Github MCP Server has 81/100 (Excellent) with 6 views, 0 installs and 33,791 GitHub stars.