Grafyx vs CodeNib

In-depth architectural comparison of the Grafyx and CodeNib MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Grafyx when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Grafyx Details

Choose CodeNib when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore CodeNib Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Grafyx Developer Tools	CodeNib Developer Tools
Summary	Real-time codebase graph for AI assistants: call graphs, dependencies, symbol lookup.	Ranked codebase search and static symbol navigation for coding agents.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "grafyx": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "--from"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "codenib": {
      "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sysevol-ai/CodeNib/main/assets/codenib_logo.svg"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons