GRAFOMEM CGR Capture vs Three.js DevTools MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the GRAFOMEM CGR Capture and Three.js DevTools MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose GRAFOMEM CGR Capture when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore GRAFOMEM CGR Capture Details

Choose Three.js DevTools MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Three.js DevTools MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	GRAFOMEM CGR Capture Developer Tools	Three.js DevTools MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Record agent judgments and their real outcomes on GRAFOMEM Cloud. Capture now, score later.	Inspect and edit Three.js scenes, materials, shaders, lights in real time from any AI agent
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "grafomem-cgr-capture": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "grafomem"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "three-js-devtools-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "threejs-devtools-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons