GrabFood MCP (via SEA MCP) vs Teamspend

In-depth architectural comparison of the GrabFood MCP (via SEA MCP) and Teamspend MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

G

Choose GrabFood MCP (via SEA MCP) when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore GrabFood MCP (via SEA MCP) Details

Choose Teamspend when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Teamspend Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	G GrabFood MCP (via SEA MCP) Developer Tools	Teamspend Developer Tools
Summary	Search GrabFood restaurants, full menus and dish prices by city, neighbourhood or radius.	Compares AI coding tool spend before and after a migration via MCP tools.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "grabfood-mcp-via-sea-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "grabfood-mcp-via-sea-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "teamspend": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "teamspend-cli"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons