Google Workspace MCP vs Nanobanana MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Google Workspace MCP and Nanobanana MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Google Workspace MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Google Workspace MCP Details

Choose Nanobanana MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Nanobanana MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Google Workspace MCP Developer Tools	Nanobanana MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Google Workspace Admin via MCP. Manage users, groups, aliases, org units.	Lean MCP server for Google's Nano Banana (Gemini) image models. Returns file paths, not base64.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "google-workspace-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/inspector"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "nanobanana-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@nanobanana/mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons