Google Workspace MCP vs Krova Node

In-depth architectural comparison of the Google Workspace MCP and Krova Node MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Google Workspace MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Google Workspace MCP Details

Choose Krova Node when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Krova Node Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Google Workspace MCP Developer Tools	Krova Node krovacloud Developer Tools
Summary	Google Workspace Admin via MCP. Manage users, groups, aliases, org units.	Provision and manage Krova Cloud Cubes — Firecracker microVMs with root access and no public IP.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "google-workspace-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/inspector"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-251": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-251"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons