Google Scholar vs Paper Chaser MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Google Scholar and Paper Chaser MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Google Scholar when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Google Scholar Details

Choose Paper Chaser MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Paper Chaser MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Google Scholar Developer Tools	Paper Chaser MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Search Google Scholar for academic papers, citations, and author profiles.	MCP server for academic papers, citations, authors, ECOS dossiers, and Federal Register text.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "google-scholar": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "mcp-remote",
        "https://mcp.apify.com/?tools=johnvc/google-scholar-api",
        "--header",
        "Authorization: Bearer <YOUR_APIFY_TOKEN>"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "paper-chaser-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "paper-chaser-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons