Google Maps Places vs Gmapsscraper MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Google Maps Places and Gmapsscraper MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Google Maps Places when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Google Maps Places Details

Choose Gmapsscraper MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Gmapsscraper MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Google Maps Places Developer Tools	Gmapsscraper MCP gmapsscraper Developer Tools
Summary	Allow AI systems to search for places and get business info via Google Maps Places API.	Scrape Google Maps business data from any MCP client — names, phones, emails, websites, ratings.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "google-maps-places": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "google-maps-places"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-341": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@gmapsscraper/mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons