Google Maps Places vs Maplith

In-depth architectural comparison of the Google Maps Places and Maplith MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Google Maps Places when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Google Maps Places Details

M

Choose Maplith when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Maplith Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Google Maps Places Developer Tools	M Maplith Developer Tools
Summary	Allow AI systems to search for places and get business info via Google Maps Places API.	Data-ontology maps of your business systems, served to AI agents over MCP.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "google-maps-places": {
      "url": "https://console.cloud.google.com/"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "maplith": {
      "url": "https://maplith.com"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons