Google Maps MCP Server vs Byteplant MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Google Maps MCP Server and Byteplant MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

G

Choose Google Maps MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Google Maps MCP Server Details

Choose Byteplant MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Byteplant MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	G Google Maps MCP Server Communication	Byteplant MCP Communication
Summary	Local business lead extraction with email + phone enrichment from Google Maps.	An MCP server that provides Email, Phone and Address Validation Services from Byteplant
Category & Scope	Communication	Communication
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "google-maps-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "google-maps-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "byteplant-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "byteplant-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons