Google Maps MCP Server vs Local Leads MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Google Maps MCP Server and Local Leads MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Google Maps MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Customer Data Platforms domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Google Maps MCP Server Details

Choose Local Leads MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Customer Data Platforms domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: live_own_site, not_own_site, domain_exists_no_site.

Explore Local Leads MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Google Maps MCP Server Customer Data Platforms	Local Leads MCP Customer Data Platforms
Summary	Search local businesses, generate leads, and validate emails via Google Maps data	Find local businesses with no website via OpenStreetMap, then verify them. No API keys needed.
Category & Scope	Customer Data Platforms	Customer Data Platforms

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "google-maps-mcp-server-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@nexgendata/google-maps-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "local-leads-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "local-leads-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons