Google Docs MCP vs Apple Calendar

In-depth architectural comparison of the Google Docs MCP and Apple Calendar MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

G

Choose Google Docs MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Workplace & Productivity domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Google Docs MCP Details

Choose Apple Calendar when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Workplace & Productivity domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Apple Calendar Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	G Google Docs MCP Workplace & Productivity	Apple Calendar Workplace & Productivity
Summary	Google Docs as MCP tools: read, edit, suggest and comment on documents.	Read and create Apple Calendar events on macOS, and find free time across calendars.
Category & Scope	Workplace & Productivity	Workplace & Productivity

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "google-docs-mcp-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "google-docs-mcp-2"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "apple-calendar-3": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@redpop/apple-calendar-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons