Google Contacts vs Magpipe

In-depth architectural comparison of the Google Contacts and Magpipe MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Google Contacts when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Google Contacts Details

Choose Magpipe when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Magpipe Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Google Contacts Developer Tools	Magpipe Developer Tools
Summary	Allow AI systems to list, search, and manage contacts via Google Contacts.	Manage AI voice agents, calls, SMS, contacts, and phone numbers via Magpipe.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "google-contacts": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "google-contacts"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "magpipe": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "supabase"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons