Google Analytics (unofficial) vs Metabase

In-depth architectural comparison of the Google Analytics (unofficial) and Metabase MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

G

Choose Google Analytics (unofficial) when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Google Analytics (unofficial) Details

Choose Metabase when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Metabase Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	G Google Analytics (unofficial) Developer Tools	Metabase Developer Tools
Summary	Connect Google Analytics to ChatGPT. Query GA4 data in plain English and get instant insights.	Lets AI clients search, explore, query, and visualize data in a Metabase instance.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "google-analytics-unofficial": {
      "url": "https://safe-mcp.com"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "metabase": {
      "url": "https://www.metabase.com"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons