Google Adwords vs KonQuest Meta Ads MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Google Adwords and KonQuest Meta Ads MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Google Adwords when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Google Adwords Details

Choose KonQuest Meta Ads MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore KonQuest Meta Ads MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Google Adwords Developer Tools	KonQuest Meta Ads MCP Developer Tools
Summary	MCP server for Google Ads campaign and budget management	Supervised Meta Ads operating system for Claude Code with 57 campaign management tools.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "google-adwords": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "google-adwords"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "konquest-meta-ads-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "konquest-meta-ads-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons