Google Ads vs KonQuest Meta Ads MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Google Ads and KonQuest Meta Ads MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

G

Choose Google Ads when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Marketing domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Google Ads Details

Choose KonQuest Meta Ads MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Marketing domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore KonQuest Meta Ads MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	G Google Ads Marketing	KonQuest Meta Ads MCP Marketing
Summary	Google Ads reporting and campaign management. Everything it creates starts paused.	Supervised Meta Ads operating system for Claude Code with 57 campaign management tools.
Category & Scope	Marketing	Marketing
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "google-ads": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "google-ads"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "konquest-meta-ads-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "konquest-meta-ads-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons