Google Ads vs SimConnect MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Google Ads and SimConnect MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Google Ads when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Google Ads Details

S

Choose SimConnect MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore SimConnect MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Google Ads Developer Tools	S SimConnect MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Google Ads: 31 read tools with full Keyword Planner, 7 write tools that preview first.	MCP server for MSFS SimConnect - full read/write access to SimVars, L-vars and events
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "google-ads-6": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@getmcpads/google-ads-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "simconnect-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "simconnect-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons