Facebook Ads Mcp Server vs TasteMaker

In-depth architectural comparison of the Facebook Ads Mcp Server and TasteMaker MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Facebook Ads Mcp Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Marketing domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Lists ad accounts linked to a Meta access token, Retrieves detailed information for campaigns, ad sets, ads, and creatives, Fetches collections of ads and ad sets by account or campaign.

Explore Facebook Ads Mcp Server Details

T

Choose TasteMaker when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Marketing domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore TasteMaker Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Facebook Ads Mcp Server gomarble-ai Marketing	T TasteMaker Marketing
Summary	MCP server acting as an interface to the Facebook Ads, enabling programmatic access to Facebook Ads data and management features.	Pull your TasteMaker brand kit + generated Agent Skill into your coding tool. Read-only.
Category & Scope	Marketing	Marketing

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "gomarble-ai-facebook-ads-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@smithery/cli"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "tastemaker": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "tastemaker"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons