Facebook Ads Mcp Server vs PushEngage

In-depth architectural comparison of the Facebook Ads Mcp Server and PushEngage MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Facebook Ads Mcp Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Marketing domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Lists ad accounts linked to a Meta access token, Retrieves detailed information for campaigns, ad sets, ads, and creatives, Fetches collections of ads and ad sets by account or campaign.

Explore Facebook Ads Mcp Server Details

P

Choose PushEngage when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Marketing domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore PushEngage Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Facebook Ads Mcp Server gomarble-ai Marketing	P PushEngage Marketing
Summary	MCP server acting as an interface to the Facebook Ads, enabling programmatic access to Facebook Ads data and management features.	Send push notifications, build audiences, and view campaign analytics from PushEngage.
Category & Scope	Marketing	Marketing

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "gomarble-ai-facebook-ads-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@smithery/cli"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "pushengage": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "pushengage"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons