Goldhold vs MemorySync

In-depth architectural comparison of the Goldhold and MemorySync MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Goldhold when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Goldhold Details

M

Choose MemorySync when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore MemorySync Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Goldhold Knowledge & Memory	M MemorySync Knowledge & Memory
Summary	Persistent memory for AI agents. Search, store, and recall across sessions.	Persistent memory for AI agents. Search and store durable facts, preferences and decisions.
Category & Scope	Knowledge & Memory	Knowledge & Memory
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "goldhold": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@goldhold/mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "memorysync": {
      "url": "https://memorysync.io/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons