What is the key difference between GoldenAnalysis and Liongard?

GoldenAnalysis belongs to the Monitoring category with local stdio execution, while Liongard belongs to the Monitoring category with local stdio execution.

How do I install GoldenAnalysis or Liongard in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are GoldenAnalysis and Liongard free or paid?

GoldenAnalysis operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Liongard operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

GoldenAnalysis lists 0 tools with 0 views and 131 GitHub stars. Liongard lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars.

Can I use both GoldenAnalysis and Liongard together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

GoldenAnalysis vs Liongard

In-depth architectural comparison of the GoldenAnalysis and Liongard MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

GoldenAnalysis

Monitoring · Local stdio

Quality: 41/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Liongard

Monitoring · Local stdio

Quality: 29/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose GoldenAnalysis if you need specialized Monitoring tools running via a local process. Choose Liongard if your workspace requires Monitoring integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose GoldenAnalysis when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Monitoring domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore GoldenAnalysis Details

Choose Liongard when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Monitoring domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Liongard Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	GoldenAnalysis Monitoring	Liongard Monitoring
Summary	Read-only cross-cutting analysis, metrics, and reporting across the Golden Suite.	MCP server for Liongard — inspectors, environments, metrics, detections, and timeline data.
Category & Scope	Monitoring	Monitoring
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

GoldenAnalysis Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Liongard Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

GoldenAnalysis Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "goldenanalysis": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "goldenmatch"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Liongard Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "liongard": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "liongard"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

GoldenAnalysis is categorized under Monitoring and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Liongard belongs to Monitoring using local stdio subprocess. Select GoldenAnalysis when you need capabilities focused on monitoring and Liongard when you require tools for monitoring.

More alternatives to GoldenAnalysis More alternatives to Liongard Monitoring category hub