Firefly MCP vs Kubernetes MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the Firefly MCP and Kubernetes MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Firefly MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Cloud Platforms domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: API Key required (BYOK (Pay Provider Direct)).
• You have access to required keys: FIREFLY_ACCESS_KEY, FIREFLY_SECRET_KEY.
• Primary tools included: Cloud and SaaS resource discovery, Resource management through Firefly, Infrastructure as Code generation.

Explore Firefly MCP Details

Choose Kubernetes MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Cloud Platforms domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: other (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: configuration_contexts_list, targets_list, configuration_view.

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Firefly MCP gofireflyio Cloud Platforms	Kubernetes MCP Server manusa Cloud Platforms
Summary
Category & Scope	Cloud Platforms	Cloud Platforms

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "gofireflyio-firefly-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@fireflyai/firefly-mcp"
      ],
      "env": {
        "FIREFLY_ACCESS_KEY": "YOUR_FIREFLY_ACCESS_KEY_HERE",
        "FIREFLY_SECRET_KEY": "YOUR_FIREFLY_SECRET_KEY_HERE"
      }
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "manusa-kubernetes-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "If"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons