GoCodebook — California Building Codes vs MCP Graphql

In-depth architectural comparison of the GoCodebook — California Building Codes and MCP Graphql MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

G

Choose GoCodebook — California Building Codes when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore GoCodebook — California Building Codes Details

Choose MCP Graphql when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: introspect-schema, query-graphql.

Explore MCP Graphql Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	G GoCodebook — California Building Codes Developer Tools	MCP Graphql blurrah Developer Tools
Summary	Verbatim California Title 24 and local zoning code lookup by section number, with citations.	Model Context Protocol server for GraphQL
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "gocodebook-california-building-codes": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "gocodebook-california-building-codes"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "blurrah-mcp-graphql": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-graphql"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons