Glyt vs Attestify OS

In-depth architectural comparison of the Glyt and Attestify OS MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

G

Choose Glyt when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Glyt Details

Choose Attestify OS when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Attestify OS Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	G Glyt Developer Tools	Attestify OS Developer Tools
Summary	Human-in-the-loop approval for agent actions, with verifiable action-bound receipts.	MCP stdio server for Attestify OS — governed agent execution with on-chain receipts.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "glyt": {
      "url": "https://glyt.net"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "attestify-os-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "attestify"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons