Figma Context MCP vs Raven

In-depth architectural comparison of the Figma Context MCP and Raven MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Figma Context MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Architecture & Design domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: API Key required (Free / Open Source).
• You have access to required keys: FIGMA_API_KEY, PORT.
• Primary tools included: get_figma_data, download_figma_images.

Explore Figma Context MCP Details

Choose Raven when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Architecture & Design domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: get_principles, get_pattern, get_business_strategy.

Explore Raven Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Figma Context MCP GLips Architecture & Design	Raven Architecture & Design
Summary
Category & Scope	Architecture & Design	Architecture & Design
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "glips-figma-context-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "figma-developer-mcp"
      ],
      "env": {
        "FIGMA_API_KEY": "YOUR_FIGMA_API_KEY_HERE",
        "PORT": "YOUR_PORT_HERE"
      }
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "raven": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "raven-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons