Giveaway & Raffle Winner Picker (provably fair) vs Bruno Mcp
In-depth architectural comparison of the Giveaway & Raffle Winner Picker (provably fair) and Bruno Mcp MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Giveaway & Raffle Winner Picker (provably fair)
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 51/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required
Bruno Mcp
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 53/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Giveaway & Raffle Winner Picker (provably fair) if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Bruno Mcp if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Instantly pick a provably-fair winner (or winners) from a list. Uses the *latest* drand round, so it's immediate and verifiable.
create_scheduled_draw
Create a draw that reveals at a **future** time, with the randomness round committed *the instant you create it* — before it exists. Nobody, including the operator, can predict or rig it. Returns a public, shareable **proof page**.
verify_draw
Fetch the current state and verified result of a scheduled draw by id.
Bruno Mcp Tools (3)
collection
environment
variables
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Giveaway & Raffle Winner Picker (provably fair) is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Bruno Mcp belongs to Developer Tools using local stdio subprocess. Select Giveaway & Raffle Winner Picker (provably fair) when you need capabilities focused on developer tools and Bruno Mcp when you require tools for developer tools.