Google Workspace MCP… vs Reclaim MCP Server | AllMCPs
Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Google Workspace MCP Server vs Reclaim MCP Server
In-depth architectural comparison of the Google Workspace MCP Server and Reclaim MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Google Workspace MCP Server
Workplace & Productivity · Local stdio
Quality: 35/100 (Fair) | Auth: OAuth 2.0
Reclaim MCP Server
Workplace & Productivity · Local stdio
Quality: 59/100 (Good) | Auth: API Key required
Verdict Summary: Choose Google Workspace MCP Server if you need specialized Workplace & Productivity tools running via a local process. Choose Reclaim MCP Server if your workspace requires Workplace & Productivity integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose Google Workspace MCP Server when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Workplace & Productivity domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: OAuth 2.0 (Free / Open Source).
Primary tools included: Google Calendar event search and management, Gmail message retrieval, search, and sending, Google Drive file and folder queries.
Google Workspace MCP Server is categorized under Workplace & Productivity and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Reclaim MCP Server belongs to Workplace & Productivity using local stdio subprocess. Select Google Workspace MCP Server when you need capabilities focused on workplace & productivity and Reclaim MCP Server when you require tools for workplace & productivity.