Github Repo Intelligence MCP vs Etincel Nonfiction

In-depth architectural comparison of the Github Repo Intelligence MCP and Etincel Nonfiction MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Github Repo Intelligence MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Github Repo Intelligence MCP Details

Choose Etincel Nonfiction when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Etincel Nonfiction Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Github Repo Intelligence MCP Developer Tools	Etincel Nonfiction Developer Tools
Summary	GitHub repo maintainability verdicts—maintained, slowing, at-risk, abandoned—via MCP.	Trainable non-fiction writing voice, presets, and an anti-AI-tells audit for Claude, via MCP.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "github-repo-intelligence-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "github-repo-intelligence-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "etincel-nonfiction-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "etincel"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons