Github MCP Server vs RepoRelay

In-depth architectural comparison of the Github MCP Server and RepoRelay MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Github MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Version Control domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: OAuth 2.0 (Free / Open Source).
• You have access to required keys: GITHUB_OAUTH_CALLBACK_PORT.
• Primary tools included: get_file_contents, getFileContents.

Explore Github MCP Server Details

Choose RepoRelay when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Version Control domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore RepoRelay Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Github MCP Server github VerifiedVersion Control	RepoRelay Version Control
Summary	Official GitHub server for integration with repository management, PRs, issues, and more.	Bounded local MCP access to one approved repository for AI read/search and structured handoffs.
Category & Scope

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "github-github-mcp-server": {
      "url": "https://api.githubcopilot.com/mcp/"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "reporelay": {
      "url": "http://127.0.0.1:7676/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons