GitHub Actions Audit vs Ida Pro MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the GitHub Actions Audit and Ida Pro MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose GitHub Actions Audit when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore GitHub Actions Audit Details

Choose Ida Pro MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (BYOK (Pay Provider Direct)).
• Primary tools included: IDA Pro decompilation access, Disassembly inspection, Database comments, renaming, and type updates.

Explore Ida Pro MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	GitHub Actions Audit Security	Ida Pro MCP mrexodia Security
Summary	GitHub Actions workflow security audit - 21 checks: pinning, permissions, secrets, injection.	MCP server for IDA Pro, allowing you to perform binary analysis with AI assistants. This plugin implement decompilation, disassembly and allows you to generate malware analysis reports automatically.
Category & Scope	Security

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "github-actions-audit": {
      "url": "https://YOUR-ACTOR-URL.apify.actor/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mrexodia-ida-pro-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "https"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons