Gitea MCP vs Oss Issues MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Gitea MCP and Oss Issues MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Gitea MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Version Control domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Gitea MCP Details

Choose Oss Issues MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Version Control domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: get_actionable_issue.

Explore Oss Issues MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Gitea MCP Version Control	Oss Issues MCP Version Control
Summary	Model Context Protocol server for Gitea (and Forgejo, Codeberg).	MCP server with derived GitHub issue tools: normalized fetch, new-issue watch, claim status.
Category & Scope	Version Control	Version Control
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "gitea-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "gitea-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "oss-issues-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "oss-issues-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons