Giskard Memory vs Elefante

In-depth architectural comparison of the Giskard Memory and Elefante MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Giskard Memory when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Giskard Memory Details

Choose Elefante when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Elefante Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Giskard Memory Knowledge & Memory	Elefante Knowledge & Memory
Summary	Pay-per-use semantic memory for AI agents. SHA256 commitment, Ed25519 sig, Lightning.	Open, Git-native memory protocol for MCP agents. Portable, versioned, human-editable.
Category & Scope	Knowledge & Memory	Knowledge & Memory
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "giskard-memory": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "elefante": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "elefante-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons