Gilbert Mcp vs Name Whisper — ENS Intelligence Layer

In-depth architectural comparison of the Gilbert Mcp and Name Whisper — ENS Intelligence Layer MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

G

Choose Gilbert Mcp when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Speech-to-Text domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: list_meetings, get_meeting, get_transcript.

Explore Gilbert Mcp Details

Choose Name Whisper — ENS Intelligence Layer when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Speech-to-Text domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Name Whisper — ENS Intelligence Layer Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	G Gilbert Mcp Speech-to-Text	Name Whisper — ENS Intelligence Layer Speech-to-Text
Summary	Gilbert meetings: list, search, and fetch transcripts & summaries via MCP.	44 MCP tools to search, value, register, trade, and manage ENS names. AI-powered intelligence layer.
Category & Scope	Speech-to-Text	Speech-to-Text
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "gilbert-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "gilbert-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "name-whisper-ens-intelligence-layer": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "namewhisper-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons