Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Ghostlight vs Open Design MCP
In-depth architectural comparison of the Ghostlight and Open Design MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Ghostlight
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 45/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Open Design MCP
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 24/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Ghostlight if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Open Design MCP if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
G
Choose Ghostlight when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
O
Choose Open Design MCP when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
Ghostlight Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Open Design MCP Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Ghostlight Configuration
Open Design MCP Configuration