GetRun vs Kie MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the GetRun and Kie MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose GetRun when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore GetRun Details

Choose Kie MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Kie MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	GetRun Developer Tools	Kie MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Image, video, audio and chat from 61 AI models through one connector. Pay per use, no subscription.	MCP for kie.ai: 45+ image, 70+ video, 20+ audio models with model intelligence
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "getrun": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-remote",
        "https://run.getcore.id/mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "kie-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "kie-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons