Mockd vs Larnitech

In-depth architectural comparison of the Mockd and Larnitech MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Mockd when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Home Automation domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Supports 7 protocols in one binary with zero dependencies, Stateful CRUD API mocking with multi-step flows, Chaos profiles, fault injection, and circuit breakers.

Explore Mockd Details

Choose Larnitech when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Home Automation domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Larnitech Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Mockd getmockd Home Automation	Larnitech Home Automation
Summary
Category & Scope	Home Automation	Home Automation
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "getmockd-mockd": {
      "url": "https://mockd.io"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "larnitech": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "larnitech-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons