Geonames vs Kubeshark

In-depth architectural comparison of the Geonames and Kubeshark MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

G

Choose Geonames when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: search_geonames, get_nearby, get_timezone.

Explore Geonames Details

Choose Kubeshark when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Kubeshark Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	G Geonames Databases	Kubeshark kubeshark Databases
Summary	GeoNames MCP — GeoNames geographical database API	Real-time Kubernetes network traffic visibility and API analysis for HTTP, gRPC, Redis, Kafka, DNS.
Category & Scope	Databases	Databases
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "geonames": {
      "url": "https://pipeworx.io"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-304": {
      "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kubeshark/assets/master/svg/kubeshark-logo.svg"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons