Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Geo Tool Check vs Paste
In-depth architectural comparison of the Geo Tool Check and Paste MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Geo Tool Check
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 44/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Paste
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 40/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Geo Tool Check if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Paste if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
G
Choose Geo Tool Check when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
P
Choose Paste when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
Geo Tool Check Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Paste Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Geo Tool Check Configuration
Paste Configuration