Gdpr Decisions vs TokenSave

In-depth architectural comparison of the Gdpr Decisions and TokenSave MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

G

Choose Gdpr Decisions when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: search_gdpr_decisions, get_decision_detail, search_by_gdpr_article.

Explore Gdpr Decisions Details

Choose TokenSave when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore TokenSave Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	G Gdpr Decisions Developer Tools	TokenSave Developer Tools
Summary	EU GDPR enforcement decisions — search all EU/EEA DPA decisions, CJEU and EDPB guidelines	Code intelligence for 15+ languages: semantic graph queries instead of file reads. 37 MCP tools.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "gdpr-decisions": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "mcp-server-gdpr-decisions"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "tokensave": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@colbymchenry/codegraph"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons