Gdc vs Hydrata ANUGA Flood Simulation

In-depth architectural comparison of the Gdc and Hydrata ANUGA Flood Simulation MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

G

Choose Gdc when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: list_projects, get_project, search_cases.

Explore Gdc Details

Choose Hydrata ANUGA Flood Simulation when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: list_projects, get_project, get_scenario.

Explore Hydrata ANUGA Flood Simulation Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	G Gdc Developer Tools	Hydrata ANUGA Flood Simulation Developer Tools
Summary	NCI Genomic Data Commons (GDC) MCP.	Run ANUGA flood simulations, track progress, and retrieve results on Hydrata Cloud.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "gdc": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "gdc"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "hydrata-anuga-flood-simulation": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "hydrata-anuga-flood-simulation"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons