Gctrl vs Talamus

In-depth architectural comparison of the Gctrl and Talamus MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Gctrl when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Gctrl Details

Choose Talamus when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Talamus Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Gctrl Knowledge & Memory	Talamus Knowledge & Memory
Summary	Governed graph-native agent memory: knowledge extraction, fusion, hybrid RAG, scoped access tokens.	Local-first, source-grounded memory that survives AI agent sessions.
Category & Scope	Knowledge & Memory	Knowledge & Memory
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "gctrl": {
      "url": "http://localhost:4000/api/agent/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "talamus": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "--from",
        "talamus",
        "talamus"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons