A side-by-side look at the MCP Server Wazuh and Kastell MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.
Verdict: choose MCP Server Wazuh for security work; choose Kastell for security as a local process. You can also run both side by side in one mcpServers block.
Which MCP server should you choose?
Choose MCP Server Wazuh when
You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Kastell tools
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Ready-to-paste client configs
Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.
MCP Server Wazuh
No confirmed install command for MCP Server Wazuh yet — follow the setup steps linked from its listing page rather than a guessed package name.
MCP Server Wazuh is categorized under Security and uses an install path we have not confirmed yet. Kastell belongs to Security and uses a local stdio subprocess. Pick MCP Server Wazuh for security work and Kastell for security.
Copy the mcpServers block from the config section on this page into your client's config (for example claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json), then fully restart the client. MCP Server Wazuh has no confirmed install command yet — follow its own setup instructions.
MCP Server Wazuh is listed as free. Auth: api key required. Kastell is listed as free. Auth: no auth required. If a server needs environment variables such as API keys, define them under the env key in your client's MCP config.
Yes. MCP clients support multiple servers: add gbrigandi-mcp-server-wazuh and kastelldev-kastell as separate keys in the same mcpServers object, and your assistant will call tools from either one.
On AllMCPs, MCP Server Wazuh has a quality signal of 45/100 (Fair) with 3 views, 0 installs and 239 GitHub stars. Kastell has 61/100 (Good) with 4 views, 0 installs and 60 GitHub stars.