GBG Loqate Reach vs Enrow MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the GBG Loqate Reach and Enrow MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose GBG Loqate Reach when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore GBG Loqate Reach Details

E

Choose Enrow MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Enrow MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	GBG Loqate Reach Communication	E Enrow MCP Communication
Summary	Verify addresses, email addresses, and phone numbers with confidence scores.	Find and verify professional emails and phone numbers via the Enrow API.
Category & Scope	Communication	Communication
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "gbg-loqate-reach": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "gbg-loqate-reach"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "enrow-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "enrow-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons