Gatewerk vs Seenpaid

In-depth architectural comparison of the Gatewerk and Seenpaid MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Gatewerk when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Gatewerk Details

Choose Seenpaid when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Seenpaid Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Gatewerk Developer Tools	Seenpaid Developer Tools
Summary	The open-source review layer for AI agents. Work done for humans is decided by humans.	Open-source, self-hosted posting layer with an MCP server for AI agents. 25+ platforms.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "gatewerk": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@gatewerk/mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "seenpaid": {
      "url": "https://img.shields.io/badge/License-AGPL_v3-blue.svg)](LICENSE"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons