Gate MCP vs Hyperliquid Spot API

In-depth architectural comparison of the Gate MCP and Hyperliquid Spot API MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

G

Choose Gate MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Gate MCP Details

Choose Hyperliquid Spot API when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Hyperliquid Spot API Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	G Gate MCP Finance & Fintech	Hyperliquid Spot API Finance & Fintech
Summary	Gate API v4 MCP server — spot, futures, options, wallet, and more.	Hyperliquid spot tokens, prices, volume, wallet balances. 454 tokens. x402 micropayment.
Category & Scope	Finance & Fintech	Finance & Fintech
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "gate-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "gate-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "hyperliquid-spot-api": {
      "url": "https://hl-spot-production.up.railway.app/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons