Garmin Connect (treinos) vs Tampermonkey MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Garmin Connect (treinos) and Tampermonkey MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Garmin Connect (treinos) when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Garmin Connect (treinos) Details

Choose Tampermonkey MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: tampermonkey_get_connection_code, tampermonkey_list, tampermonkey_get.

Explore Tampermonkey MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Garmin Connect (treinos) Developer Tools	Tampermonkey MCP Developer Tools
Summary	List, fetch, create, edit (replace), delete and schedule structured workouts on Garmin Connect (runn	MCP server to manage your Tampermonkey scripts
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "garmin-connect-treinos": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "garmin-connect-treinos"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "tampermonkey-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "tampermonkey-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons