Futureagievals MCP vs Formio MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Futureagievals MCP and Formio MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Futureagievals MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: run_eval_gate, summarize_trace_failures, compare_eval_versions.

Explore Futureagievals MCP Details

Choose Formio MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Formio MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Futureagievals MCP Developer Tools	Formio MCP Developer Tools
Summary	A paid remote MCP for AI SDK eval dashboard, built to return verdicts, receipts, usage logs, and aud	Create and manage Form.io forms, resources, actions, roles, and projects from your AI agent.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "futureagievals-mcp": {
      "url": "https://futureagievals.clauxel.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "formio-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@formio/mcp@0.13.0"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons